IACPOS and Tickamore: compare the right product
If you are looking for an IACPOS alternative, include Tickamore in the comparison. Its official company page uses the name TICKAMORE by IACPOS and describes its work in ticketing and access control for cultural and leisure venues.
What Tickamore offers
Tickamore’s official materials describe integrated sales channels including online sales, ticket booth and self-service kiosks. Online ticketing is part of the offering; it should not be dismissed as a box-office-only system.
A useful evaluation covers how your venue handles admission, visitor capacity, groups and the equipment at entry. The right scope depends on your operation, whether you run a museum, heritage site or leisure attraction.
When to consider TicketingHub
TicketingHub offers website booking, reseller availability management and point-of-sale ticket sales. It is worth evaluating when you want those workflows in one booking platform. Bring your ticket types and operational rules to a demo so the team can show how they work.
If you depend on unattended kiosks, existing gates, specialist membership rules or external call-centre processes, confirm compatibility and scope separately. A booking platform does not automatically replace every service in a venue-wide ticketing installation.
Compare online sales, admissions and distribution
Demonstrate a mobile booking, a box-office sale and a ticket scan using your proposed configuration. Check refunds, duplicate scans, re-entry and reporting. Ask what equipment or integration work is required and how support is arranged.
List your reseller channels and confirm each connection with both suppliers. For TicketingHub, test how availability and ticket types map to each supported channel. Do not infer a missing feature simply because it is not described on a public page.
Compare an itemised quote with booking fees
The official Tickamore pages reviewed do not establish a universal price for every venue. Ask for an itemised proposal covering software, chosen modules, equipment, implementation and ongoing services. Avoid assuming a particular contract length or fee structure without the applicable offer.
TicketingHub charges 3% per successful online, OTA or card-paid in-person booking, with no monthly or setup fee. Cash sales are free. Operators can absorb the fee or pass it on; payment processing and marketplace commissions are separate.
Use the same booking values and sales channels for both calculations. Include payment processing, marketplace commissions and any separate equipment or integration costs. Neither a quote-based package nor a percentage fee is automatically cheaper.
Can visitors change their own tickets?
TicketingHub’s Magic Link supports eligible changes within your configured policies and deadlines. Test date changes, cancellations and voucher handling using your own rules, and ask Tickamore to demonstrate equivalent requirements.
Plan the move before changing live sales
Agree the migration scope, price and timeline before switching. Test products, availability, payments, refunds and confirmations. During any parallel trial, keep one clear source of capacity so the same places are not sold twice. Existing supplier agreements and payment-provider requirements still apply.
Compare your own workflow in a demo
Bring a typical product, a busy day and a breakdown of website, reseller and in-person sales. Ask TicketingHub to demonstrate the complete booking and check-in journey against your requirements.
Sources and review date
Published by TicketingHub. Sources reviewed on 19 October 2026. Final pricing, integrations and migration scope depend on your agreed configuration.
